![]() |
|||
| To nominate someone to the readership,
go here.
Please send your comments here.
Past
Corporate Warfare issues
Send this newsletter to a colleague.
This has its roots in General Sun Tzu’s notion of being “unfathomable”
where the enemy (a.k.a. your competition) doesn’t really understand what
you’re doing so it’s inefficient or even impossible
to effectively plan against you , (e.g. the classic “when
close, appear far away”). It helps you move your competition around, wasting their
resources. This helps you keep things short. The Chinese knew that no war
is best but, failing that, keep it short. A short war is cheaper in all
the ways war costs. This helps keep the people (shareholders, employees)
on your side.
|
So, being obscure about your process and goals can be a useful thing. The Chinese liked the notion of being like fog. It’s hard to see what’s going on inside fog. Inside you can move with intensity and precision but from the outside you’re invisible. Perhaps a modern illustration will help. The following was forwarded to us
by an energy client that insists we at Parcon
Research have no discernable sense of humor (“What? In
THIS economy!?”). It is an anonymous letter sent to the Financial Times this
week regarding Enron’s competitive style. Clearly Lay and his Crew knew a lot about Fog.
Unfortunately they forgot it's most important characteristic.
Of course, a great General plans for the inevitable: fog always clears . --------------------------------------------------
To nominate someone to the readership, go here. Note: only an existing reader can do this. Send general comments or questions
here
. To delete yourself from the list go here
and
This newsletter is produced by Parcon Research. |